<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why the Keyword Meta Tag Doesn&#8217;t Matter&#8230; And I Can Prove It!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jtrigsby.com/2009/09/why-the-keyword-meta-tag-doesnt-matter-and-i-can-prove-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jtrigsby.com/2009/09/why-the-keyword-meta-tag-doesnt-matter-and-i-can-prove-it/</link>
	<description>Life In the Internet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 12:35:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: marckdon</title>
		<link>http://www.jtrigsby.com/2009/09/why-the-keyword-meta-tag-doesnt-matter-and-i-can-prove-it/comment-page-1/#comment-346</link>
		<dc:creator>marckdon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 May 2010 10:54:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jtrigsby.com/2009/09/why-the-keyword-meta-tag-doesnt-matter-and-i-can-prove-it/#comment-346</guid>
		<description>hello everyone, thanks everybody.cause everybody send great information</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hello everyone, thanks everybody.cause everybody send great information</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jtrigsby</title>
		<link>http://www.jtrigsby.com/2009/09/why-the-keyword-meta-tag-doesnt-matter-and-i-can-prove-it/comment-page-1/#comment-180</link>
		<dc:creator>jtrigsby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 21:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jtrigsby.com/2009/09/why-the-keyword-meta-tag-doesnt-matter-and-i-can-prove-it/#comment-180</guid>
		<description>Well... nothing on purpose... but I just looked and saw at least one search keyword for race horse... I guess there&#039;s no accounting for what some people will look for!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now if you Google jtrigsby race horse... Number One Baby! ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well&#8230; nothing on purpose&#8230; but I just looked and saw at least one search keyword for race horse&#8230; I guess there&#39;s no accounting for what some people will look for!</p>
<p>Now if you Google jtrigsby race horse&#8230; Number One Baby! <img src='http://www.jtrigsby.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jtrigsby</title>
		<link>http://www.jtrigsby.com/2009/09/why-the-keyword-meta-tag-doesnt-matter-and-i-can-prove-it/comment-page-1/#comment-179</link>
		<dc:creator>jtrigsby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 21:36:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jtrigsby.com/2009/09/why-the-keyword-meta-tag-doesnt-matter-and-i-can-prove-it/#comment-179</guid>
		<description>Hey Harold, thanks for stoppin by.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As far as I know, the labels in Blogger work like tags in WordPress and thats it. No real advantage to them beyond the extra search and nav enhancements they provide.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;One easy way to find out is to pick some really obscure word and add it as a label to a post. After a couple of days, check Google with a query like &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;site:{mysitename.com} {really obscure word}&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;for example&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://site:jtrigsby.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;site:jtrigsby.com&lt;/a&gt; race horses&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;this will show you if that word is being indexed as content by Google. If it is being indexed, then it could count for something... but I&#039;m not sure its worth the effort you&#039;re putting in to it. (Sorry)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Harold, thanks for stoppin by.</p>
<p>As far as I know, the labels in Blogger work like tags in WordPress and thats it. No real advantage to them beyond the extra search and nav enhancements they provide.</p>
<p>One easy way to find out is to pick some really obscure word and add it as a label to a post. After a couple of days, check Google with a query like </p>
<p>site:{mysitename.com} {really obscure word}</p>
<p>for example</p>
<p><a href="http://site:jtrigsby.com" rel="nofollow">site:jtrigsby.com</a> race horses</p>
<p>this will show you if that word is being indexed as content by Google. If it is being indexed, then it could count for something&#8230; but I&#39;m not sure its worth the effort you&#39;re putting in to it. (Sorry)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harold</title>
		<link>http://www.jtrigsby.com/2009/09/why-the-keyword-meta-tag-doesnt-matter-and-i-can-prove-it/comment-page-1/#comment-178</link>
		<dc:creator>Harold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 19:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jtrigsby.com/2009/09/why-the-keyword-meta-tag-doesnt-matter-and-i-can-prove-it/#comment-178</guid>
		<description>Oh and by the way, what does this post have to do with racehorses? XD</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh and by the way, what does this post have to do with racehorses? XD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harold</title>
		<link>http://www.jtrigsby.com/2009/09/why-the-keyword-meta-tag-doesnt-matter-and-i-can-prove-it/comment-page-1/#comment-177</link>
		<dc:creator>Harold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 19:51:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jtrigsby.com/2009/09/why-the-keyword-meta-tag-doesnt-matter-and-i-can-prove-it/#comment-177</guid>
		<description>Really really helpful post, Rigsby. I have a concern, and perhaps you know the answer: I&#039;ve been spending a ridiculous amount of time going back to old Blogger posts and entering Labels (Blogger&#039;s version of tags), since they introduced the feature about a year or two ago and all of my pre-2007 posts didn&#039;t have these labels. My thinking has been, Google owns Blogger, and since Blogger has introduced this Labels feature perhaps Google utilizes the labels in their search engine. In fact, I could swear that I read something somewhere stating exactly that. Do you happen to know? (I know that meta tags are quite different from the tags features of blog systems, but I&#039;m still wondering.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really really helpful post, Rigsby. I have a concern, and perhaps you know the answer: I&#39;ve been spending a ridiculous amount of time going back to old Blogger posts and entering Labels (Blogger&#39;s version of tags), since they introduced the feature about a year or two ago and all of my pre-2007 posts didn&#39;t have these labels. My thinking has been, Google owns Blogger, and since Blogger has introduced this Labels feature perhaps Google utilizes the labels in their search engine. In fact, I could swear that I read something somewhere stating exactly that. Do you happen to know? (I know that meta tags are quite different from the tags features of blog systems, but I&#39;m still wondering.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
